首页> 外文OA文献 >SAKK 24/09: safety and tolerability of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel vs. bevacizumab plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced stage breast cancer - a multicenter, randomized phase III trial.
【2h】

SAKK 24/09: safety and tolerability of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel vs. bevacizumab plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced stage breast cancer - a multicenter, randomized phase III trial.

机译:SAKK 24/09:贝伐单抗联合紫杉醇与贝伐单抗联合节律性环磷酰胺和卡培他滨作为HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌患者的一线治疗的安全性和耐受性-多中心,随机,III期试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy improves response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We aimed to demonstrate decreased toxicity with metronomic chemotherapy/bevacizumab compared with paclitaxel/bevacizumab.METHODS: This multicenter, randomized phase III trial compared bevacizumab with either paclitaxel (arm A) or daily oral capecitabine-cyclophosphamide (arm B) as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. The primary endpoint was the incidence of selected grade 3-5 adverse events (AE) including: febrile neutropenia, infection, sensory/motor neuropathy, and mucositis. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, PFS, overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and pharmacoeconomics. The study was registered prospectively with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01131195 on May 25, 2010.RESULTS: Between September 2010 and December 2012, 147 patients were included at 22 centers. The incidence of primary endpoint-defining AEs was similar in arm A (25 % [18/71]; 95 % CI 15-35 %) and arm B (24 % [16/68]; 95 % CI 13-34 %; P = 0.96). Objective response rates were 58 % (42/73; 95 % CI 0.46-0.69) and 50 % (37/74; 95 % CI 0.39-0.61) in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.45). Median PFS was 10.3 months (95 % CI 8.7-11.3) in arm A and 8.5 months (95 % CI 6.5-11.9) in arm B (P = 0.90). Other secondary efficacy endpoints were not significantly different between study arms. The only statistically significant differences in QoL were less hair loss and less numbness in arm B. Treatment costs between the two arms were equivalent.CONCLUSION: This trial failed to meet its primary endpoint of a reduced rate of prespecified grade 3-5 AEs with metronomic bevacizumab, cyclophosphamide and capecitabine.
机译:背景:在化疗中加入贝伐单抗可提高转移性​​乳腺癌(mBC)的应答率和无进展生存期(PFS)。我们的目的是证明与紫杉醇/贝伐单抗相比,节律化疗/贝伐单抗的毒性降低。方法:该多中心随机III期试验比较贝伐单抗与紫杉醇(A组)或每日口服卡培他滨-环磷酰胺(B组)作为一线治疗HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌的患者。主要终点是选定的3-5级不良事件(AE)的发生率,包括:发热性中性粒细胞减少,感染,感觉/运动神经病和粘膜炎。次要终点包括客观缓解率,疾病控制率,PFS,总生存期(OS),生活质量(QoL)和药物经济学。该研究已于2010年5月25日在ClinicalTrials.gov上进行了前瞻性注册,结果为NCT01131195。结果:从2010年9月至2012年12月,在22个中心共纳入147例患者。在A组(25%[18/71]; 95%CI 15-35%)和B组(24%[16/68]; 95%CI 13-34%; A组(25%[18/71]; 95%CI 15-35%)和主要终点定义AE的发生率相似。 P = 0.96)。 A组和B组的客观缓解率分别为58%(42/73; 95%CI 0.46-0.69)和50%(37/74; 95%CI 0.39-0.61)(P = 0.45)。 A组中位PFS为10.3个月(95%CI 8.7-11.3),B组中位PFS为8.5个月(95%CI 6.5-11.9)(P = 0.90)。其他次要功效终点在研究组之间无显着差异。 QoL的唯一统计学上显着差异是B组的脱发和麻木少。两个组之间的治疗费用相同。结论:该试验未能达到其主要终点指标,即预先确定的3-5级AE与节律性疾病发生率降低贝伐单抗,环磷酰胺和卡培他滨。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号